https://bf4db.com/player/354858177

Has been reported clean, here is more evidence.

I suspect OscyJack of an Aimbot.

His appeal thread: https://bf4db.com/forum/thread/ban-appeal-oscyjack-42

I would like to make a case that involves both statistics and video proof. Together I believe there is enough proof of an aimbot for the initial ban will be reinstated. As the initial ban was based on only a few pulled battlereports, I pulled all of them to compare them.

As my entire report is too long here is a pastbin, and a google doc link OscyJack's Report 

Here is the stats link: details in the paste bin

Here is the video link: Details are both in the paste bin and the video description

Summary:

1. Stats

1. His stats change beyond the expected variance round to round on occasion

2. After a 5 month break and just a few terrible rounds that could be expected, he rebounds to several winning rounds with an accuracy from ~10% to 44%.

3. 2 months ago, after his ~50 rounds with 37-41% average accuracy, he drops to 20% and below average accuracy for ~180 (spreadsheet row 340) rounds

4. After very many rounds and an average accuracy at 20% or lower, with his ban being lifted, his accuracy is back at 29% (12 round average) close to where it was before he took his 8 month break.

5. After his successful ban appeal, his accuracy actually increases a bit, to a 50 round average of 27%. Much higher than his over 100 matches at under 20% average accuracy

II. Video evidence (inspect at 0.25 speed)

1. Almost all of his revolver/pistol kills are on the first shot. EDIT: (7/10) -

2. Many of the auto kills are also with the first shot, almost all are within 3 shots.

3. His revolver kills and both railgun kills snap to center of mass as he fires EDIT: I realize this could be a spectator glitch, but I have never seen it before.

4. Railgun headshot on a moving target with a snap ahead of target as it fires

Each of these points and kills might be dismissed as luck or glitches, or as circumstantial evidence. However, combined, they provide a preponderance of evidence of OscyJack using an Aimbot.

Just leaving a note here to say we're reviewing this case again.  This may take a few days to process.  

Any updates on this one? Thanks.

There are too many factors here to re-instate a ban. Accuracy can be affected by the weapons used and if the video is any indication of the weapon progression then the large accuracy variations are even more readily explained. Semi-auto and precision weapons coupled with the low health in hardcore means the number of shots fired round to round are so few that dramatic variations in accuracy are simply normal. Spectator mode is also not reliable for monitoring micro aiming such as where someone is aiming on the body.

Oscyjack if you want to provide first person video recording of a round where you achieve a 30% or higher accuracy you are welcome to do so but I see no hard evidence. Only circumstantial evidence easily explained and exacerbated by the game mode, weapon types, and health values.

Burt thanks for the reply. If you'd like me to post one I can,but if it doesn't help/hurt I probably won't take the time to do so.i have a few filmed third person via cell phone and a bunch of 30 second rewinds available as of this moment . if advised to do so I can record a full match within the coming days.

Thanks again for your time.

Watching a first/third person gameplay video of you playing will definitely help us to draw a better picture of your capabilities ingame and your skill so that we can judge better on new "evidencial" footage provided against you and figure this out a bit faster.

It is not mandatory for your to provide a gameplay as we don't have any/enough evidence to issue a ban however it will improve your chances to stay banfree in case someone tries to report you again.

Just a reminder. Last active. March. nice coincidence your ACC% went up that month from 20% to 45% average.

catalyst-hax.com/forum/user/129579-oscyjack/

Said enough.

Im out

This thread isn't supposed to turn into a witch hunt against him.

An account on a Cheatsite is circumstantial due to the fact that you can't provide the account is owned by him. Someone could go ahead and create an account on a cheat site with your name. Would you agree with getting banned for that eventhough its not even your account?

We don't have enough evidence to re-instate the ban. As long as we don't receive said evidence we won't ban him.

I knew you would deny it.

But i still want everyone to know. Check his battle reports, see the dates his accuracy increased by 50%. See it for yourself and then delete my threads. Oscyjack is not the most common name.

Not enough evidence. Don't forget that you have banned him. All you need to do is ban appeal and type lies to get unbanned. Check his stats again, the evidence is loud and clear.

Seem like all my post are useless anyways

Roger on all. 

Third party I would like to remain unlisted, is this okay? First person I'm fine posting publicly . Let me know where to post and I will work on getting some full length matches 

Postal, without trying to start a tit for tat and with respect to you and this forum, I find the timing  very convenient for that link, especially when paired with the depth of the report given. Just saying.

Also 3 month ago before March 14th. All normal ACC% battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/840793091616381312/354858177/

I didn't even open the link, don't need to because it isn't me whatever it is or says. I'm fine co tinuing discussion here but don't want to break the rules so I will hold all responses unless told I can type freely herein