In relation to my previous ban appeal. There is no tangible evidence that I have cheated, only a suspicion, how is this any reason to ban someone permanently from servers?
Frankly, it's not at all fair, just because my Kills Per Hour is high and my headshots were just above half, that does not count as sufficient evidence to ban someone indefinitely, there are far better players than me, and they aren't suspected of cheating.
Please, if there's any adequate evidence of me cheating, I'd like to see it. I know it's my word against someone else's, but how am I supposed to prove myself to you?
Asking me to explain myself to you about the kills and headshots just isn't enough as far as I can see.
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/1042578458795330048/1516594343/ 78% HSR M240B
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/1042180901242715520/1516594343/ 80% HSR M240B, ACWR
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/1043695302937109056/1516594343/ 71% HSR Famas and some other weapons
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/1044762091679610112/1516594343/ 71% HSR Type 95B.
The average headshotrates of these guns are 20-30% for a normall player (lmg even lower), but you manage to up this by more than 2 times, so thats quite some hard evidence. your ban appeal is denied, please stop making new posts or your forum permissions will be removed.
Greetings,
GoodFood2K16
Nah.
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/1044762091679610112/1516594343/
This happened in a 100HP server and you managed to get 52KPH. Kills Per Hit, not Kills Per Hour.
It means you kill a guy with 2 bullets on average. TYPE-95B-1 deals 24.5 DMG with a body shot and 52 DMG with a headshot.
So it means 100% of your bullets hit the enemies' head. I wonder how is that possible without using an AImbot.
That's the tangible evidence you want.